Legal Opinion

Haugland v. Canton

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 12, 1957No. 37,094PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dell, Chief Justice.

In this action plaintiffs seek specific performance of an alleged oral contract for the sale of real estate, or if that relief be denied, then for damages for breach of contract. The case was tried by the court without a jury. Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment denying specific performance and awarding to them only the value of certain seed furnished by the plaintiffs.

The following facts appear from unchallenged findings and hence must be taken as true. Defendants were the owners of certain farm lands in Chippewa County, each having an undivided interest therein. In March…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc. v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Raney v. Barnes Lumber Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1954
  3. Land O' Lakes Dairy Co. v. County of WadenaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  4. Langellier v. SchaeferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  5. Melin v. WoolleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  2. Benigni v. County of St. LouisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  3. Owen Jones & Sons, Inc. v. CR Lewis CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Borchert v. MaloneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  5. Wachter Development, L.L.C. v. GomkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API