Shull v. Sexton
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frantz
A decree for specific performance of a contract, resulting from an election to exercise an option, entered by the trial court in favor of the Sextons, the optioneepurchasers, and against the Shulls, the optionor-vendors, is the subject of review by writ of error issued by this Court on the application of the latter.
On August 5, 1957, the Shulls agreed in writing to convey certain realty to the Sextons upon payment of a $1500.00 balance on or before January 15, 1958, and in the agreement the following also appears:
“Sellers grant unto the buyers a further option to purchase an additional tract…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Trotter v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
- Ullsperger v. MeyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
- N. E. D. Holding Co. v. McKinleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Martindell v. Fiduciary Counsel, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
- Northern Illinois Coal Corp. v. CryderIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Bill Barrett Corporation v. YMC Royalty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Ballow v. PHICO Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Botticello v. StefanoviczSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Zurcher v. HerveatMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- Hall v. Add-Ventures, Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 1985
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.