Adler v. Katus

This action was begun in justice’s court, where the defendants had judgment. It was then taken to the circuit court on certiorari, where the judgment ren*87dered by the justice was affirmed. The return made by the justice to the circuit court shows that:

“On the trial of said cause, the defendant Peter Katus, a witness sworn on the part of the plaintiff under the statute, and the only witness to testify, testified that the plaintiff entered into an agreement for the purchase of a parcel of real estate which was owned by Peter Katus and Charles J. Katus as joint owners. This agreement was in the…