Legal Opinion

Rothstein v. Weeks

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1923No. Docket No. 43PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

This action was brought to recover from defendant $500 paid him by plaintiff, tentatively as the latter claimed, on a contract entered into by them for a so-called exchange of real estate which was not consummated. The parties to the litigation are married men. Plaintiff and his wife owned as tenants by entirety a two-family flat located on Clairmont avenue in the city of Detroit, occupying the lower flat with their family as their home. Defendant and his wife owned as tenants by entirety a six-family apartment brick building located on Alger avenue and a four-family apartment located on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hodge v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Way v. RootMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Dikeman v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Cleveland Refining Co. v. DunningMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Kuchenmeister v. DuszaMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Loyal Order of Moose, Adrian Lodge 1034 v. FaulhaberMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Sharrar v. Wayne Savings Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Wetzel v. RobertsMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Stout v. PorrittMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  5. White Showers, Inc. v. FischerMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API