Legal Opinion

State v. McNamer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 23, 1986No. 85-780-C-1, 85-781-C-1, 85-782-C-1, 85-783-C-1 CA A36465 (Control), CA A36466, CA A36467, CA A36468 (Cases Consolidated)PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Defendant appeals his convictions in four consolidated cases and seeks modification of his sentence. He was found guilty of one count of conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance, four counts of delivery of a controlled substance and four counts of possession of a controlled substance. We reverse in part and affirm in part.

In case number 85-780-C-1, convictions for conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance and possession of a controlled substance were “merged” for sentencing purposes into the conviction for delivery of a controlled substance. Defendant was placed on probation for five…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. DinkelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. State v. ApplegateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. State v. IlesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. State v. MattCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. SargentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. State v. O'BRIENCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  3. State v. AguilarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. State v. BurlewCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. State v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API