State v. Iles
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
Defendant appeals four separate convictions for delivery of a controlled substance and four separate convictions for possession of a controlled substance. She contends that the verdicts were improper and that the court could not lawfully order restitution.
Defendant was charged in four separate indictments with delivery of a controlled substance. Each indictment alleged, in identical language, that she had delivered cocaine, but each alleged a different date of delivery. Her principal defense was that she was entrapped by the police agent into committing the alleged acts. The cases were…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. PettitCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- State v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State v. LavenderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. SargentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. McNamerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State v. HeneghanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. HeneghanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. SargentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991