Legal Opinion

State v. Iles

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 4, 1986No. 84-1034-C, 84-1035-C, 84-1036-C, 84-1037-C; A35680, A35681, A35682, A35683PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Defendant appeals four separate convictions for delivery of a controlled substance and four separate convictions for possession of a controlled substance. She contends that the verdicts were improper and that the court could not lawfully order restitution.

Defendant was charged in four separate indictments with delivery of a controlled substance. Each indictment alleged, in identical language, that she had delivered cocaine, but each alleged a different date of delivery. Her principal defense was that she was entrapped by the police agent into committing the alleged acts. The cases were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. PettitCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. State v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. State v. LavenderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SargentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. State v. McNamerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. State v. HeneghanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. State v. HeneghanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. State v. SargentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API