Legal Opinion

State v. Matt

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 28, 1983No. C82-08-36733; CA A27414PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted of arson in the first degree and of conspiracy to commit the same arson. He contends he may not be convicted of both. ORS 161.485(3) provides:

“A person shall not be convicted on the basis of the same course of conduct of both the actual commission of an offense and an attempt to commit that offense or solicitation of that offense or conspiracy to commit that offense.”

Defendant is correct, and we reverse and remand for entry of a new judgment.1

The question raised in defendant’s other assignment of error was not raised in the trial court; therefore, it is not cognizable…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. CharlesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. McNamerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API