State v. Burlew
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Per curiam
Defendant appeals her convictions for conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(1); ORS 161.450(1), delivery of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(1), and possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(4). The state concedes that the trial court erred in entering separate convictions and sentences. We accept the concession. ORS 161.485(3); State v. McNamer, 80 Or App 418, 421, 722 P2d 51 (1986).
The state argues, nonetheless, that we should not reach the merger question, because defendant failed to raise it below. Alleged errors will not be addressed on appeal unless…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. McNamerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. SargentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. MendosaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- State v. HeneghanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. HeneghanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. SargentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991