Legal Opinion

State v. Clark

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 13, 1989No. CF87-100, CF87-99 CA A44292 (Control), CA A44443PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance and two convictions for delivery of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(1)(b); ORS 475.992(4). The cases are consolidated on appeal but were tried separately. In case number 87-99, defendant was convicted of delivery and possession of a controlled substance. In case number 87-100, he was convicted of delivery of a controlled substance.

In his first assignment of error, defendant contends that, in case number 87-99, the trial court erred in not merging his conviction for possession of a controlled substance with his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BowkerOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  2. State v. ColeOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. McNamerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. State v. CaulderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. State v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SargentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. State v. WigglesworthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. State v. HeneghanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. State v. HeneghanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. State v. SargentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API