Legal Opinion

State v. Rivas

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1995No. 62404-6PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.

— Following his jury conviction for vehicular homicide by intoxication, Appellant Simon Rivas (Rivas) moved for arrest of judgment because the information did not include the nonstatutory element of a causal connection between intoxication and death. The trial judge denied the motion and Rivas appealed in Division One of the Court of Appeals. We accepted certification from that court and now hold that causation between intoxication and death is not an element of vehicular homicide.

Facts

On August 28, 1992, Rivas was the driver in a 1-car accident which left the passenger dead. Before the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. State v. CleppeWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Micinski v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. StrohWashington Supreme Court · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. State v. BashWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In re the Marriage of LeslieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  4. State v. GroomWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. GroomWashington Supreme Court · 1997

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API