Legal Opinion

State v. Stroh

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1979No. 45096PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

The respondent, an attorney, was charged with the crime of tampering with a witness, which is defined in RCW 9A.72.120:(1) A person is guilty of tampering with a witness if he attempts to induce a witness or person he has reason to believe is about to be called as a witness in any official proceeding to:(a) Testify falsely or, without right or privilege to do so, to withhold any testimony; or(b) Absent himself from such proceedings.(2) Tampering with a witness is a class C felony.

It appears that a police officer had arrested one of the respondent's clients, charged him with driving while…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Pettibone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. City of Seattle v. DrewWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. TurnerWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  5. State v. JenningsArizona Supreme Court · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. BashWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. RempelWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. RhodesWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. RivasWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. CavalloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API