State v. Bash
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.
— Respondents Lawrence E. Delzer and Edward D. Bash were charged by information with violating RCW 16.08.100(3), which provides that the owner of a dog which aggressively attacks and causes severe injury or death of a human being is guilty of a class C felony. The trial court concluded that the statute sets forth a strict liability offense but that a defendant may assert as an affirmative defense that he or she neither knew nor should have known that the dog was a potentially dangerous or dangerous dog. We granted discretionary review and reverse, holding that the statute does not define a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- Cockle v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Cockle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- Duke v. BoydWashington Supreme Court · 1997
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.