Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Leslie

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 13, 1998No. 41011-3-IPublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWebster, J.

Stephen Verhey petitioned to modify his *799child support obligation, claiming a substantial change in circumstances. The trial court modified the award downward. Marianne Leslie, (n/k/a Marianne Leslie Leonard) appeals. She contends the trial court improperly interpreted the child support schedule statute RCW 26.19 by shifting a burden to her to demonstrate grounds for “deviating” from the standard support schedule. She also asserts that the trial court erred in awarding Mr. Verhey costs and attorney fees under Mandatory Arbitration Rule (MAR) 7.3. She argues RCW 26.09.140 applies to fee awards…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. In Re Marriage of GriffinWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. RivasWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Lambert v. LambertWashington Supreme Court · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of MuhammadWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. In re the Marriage of MuhammadWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. In re the Marriage of FioritoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  4. In re the Marriage of McCauslandWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. In re the Marriage of DoddCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API