State v. Groom
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
947 P.2d 240 (1997)
133 Wash.2d 679
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Larry D. GROOM, Petitioner.
No. 63951-5
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued October 10, 1996.
Decided November 20, 1997.
Browne & Ressler, John Henry Browne, Seattle, for petitioner.
John D. Knodell, Grant County Prosecutor, Stephen J. Hallstrom, Deputy County Prosecutor, for respondent.
MADSEN, Justice.
The State seeks to prosecute Defendant Larry Groom for criminal trespass, official misconduct, and unlawful search without a warrant under RCW 10.79.040 and .045. The trial court dismissed the charges on a Knapstad motion.…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Durham; Concurrence · Sanders.
2Cases cited47 opinions
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- State v. SullivanWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. SullivanWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re YimWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. Van WoerdenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.