State v. Groom
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.
— The State seeks to prosecute Defendant Larry Groom for criminal trespass, official misconduct, and unlawful search without a warrant under RCW 10.79.040 and .045. The trial court dismissed the charges on a Knapstad motion. State v. Knapstad, 107 Wn.2d 346, 729 P.2d 48 (1986). The Grant County Superior Court affirmed dismissal of the criminal trespass and official misconduct charges, but reversed as to the unlawful search charge. The Court of Appeals held that none of the charges were properly dismissed, and remanded for trial. Defendant contends that he is immune as a matter of law from…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- State v. GentryWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- United States v. Theodore J. Isaacs and Otto Kerner, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- State v. SullivanWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. SullivanWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re YimWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. GroomWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. Van WoerdenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.