Legal Opinion

Palardy v. Horner

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided April 7, 1989No. Civ. A. 87-2732-TPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

TAURO, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, 29 employees of the Department of the Navy, 1 bring this action to challenge the Navy’s decision to classify all of them as exempt from the overtime requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 207 (“FLSA”). Additionally, they seek to recover back pay to November 1, 1985, the date of their change in FLSA status, as well as liquidated damages.

The parties have submitted the case to this court on an agreed-upon documentary record. This opinion constitutes this court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a).

I

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Beebe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  3. United States v. Tallice Andrews and Thurston BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  4. Abundis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
  5. Wheeler v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Berg v. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  2. Hashop v. Rockwell Space Operations Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1994
  3. Campbell v. United States Air ForceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1990
  4. Abreu v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  5. Berg v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API