Legal Opinion

Abreu v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 2, 1991No. Nos. 574-88C, 661-88C, 695-88C & 95-89CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

These consolidated actions, brought by approximately 9,000 federal firefighters, *232present two issues: 1) whether defendant’s current method of compensating plaintiffs for unscheduled, irregular overtime deprives them of benefits under either the Pair Labor Standards Amendments of 1974 (“FLSA”)1 or under certain provisions of the Federal Employees Pay Act (“FEPA” or “Title 5”)2; and 2) whether defendant’s use of a “two-thirds rule” in excluding sleeping and eating time from 24-hour tours of unscheduled, irregular overtime is contrary to Title 5.

Like other similar actions…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Walling v. A. H. Belo Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  2. Alan A. Abreu v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  3. Amshey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
  4. Alexander v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  5. Abreu v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API