Legal Opinion
Abundis v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided September 13, 1988No. 22-88CPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
Pending before the court is defendant’s Motion To Dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, propounded under RUSCC 12(b)(1).1 The pleadings and submissions have been considered, and for the reasons discussed below, the motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
Ruben S. Abundis and some 575 others who have filed their written consent to be party plaintiffs in accordance with 29 U.S. C. § 216(b) are or were employed by the United States Government in engineering, technical, or related job categories at various locations. This action seeks declaratory relief, backpay, liquidated damages,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Rubin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hammond v. LenfestCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Michael Zumerling v. Donald J. DevineCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Berg v. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Alan A. Abreu v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Palardy v. HornerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989
- American Satellite Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
- Abreu v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.