Legal Opinion
Wheeler v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided February 3, 1986No. 528-82CPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge.
This is a civilian pay case which comes before this court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs bring this lawsuit pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (1982), alleging that defendant erroneously computed their “regular rate” and “overtime rate” of pay resulting in the underpayment of wages which plaintiffs allege they were lawfully entitled to receive. After a careful examination of the *580pleadings and the submitted papers, the court concludes that there are no genuine issues as to any fact…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Michael Zumerling v. Donald J. DevineCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
3Cited by5 opinions
- Richard A. Laforte and Rickey A. Rogers v. Constance Horner, Director, U.S. Office of Personnel Management and the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Abundis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- Palardy v. HornerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989
- Brooks v. WeinbergerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1989
- Richard A. Laforte and Rickey A. Rogers v. Constance Horner, Director, U.S. Office of Personnel Management and the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987