Erskine v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment awarding recovery against appellant for additional or increased duties on certain calculating machines imported from Bremen. The liability is based on a document held by the District Court to be an agreement of appellant given under the Tariff Act of September 21, 1922, c. 356, title 4, § 485 (d), 19 U.S.C.A. § 355.
Appellee admits that if the document in question does not comply with the requirements of the statute, the customs brokers making the entry as consignees and not the appellant are liable for the additional duties. Appellant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miller v. Standard Nut Margarine Co. of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- CRAIG v. the State of MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Wetmore v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Heaton-Hobson Associated Law Offices v. ArperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Armature Exchange, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1939
- Top Form Brassiere Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
- Air Carrier Supply Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
- United States v. WigmoreDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1943
- Walter E. Von Kalinowski v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.