Heaton-Hobson Associated Law Offices v. Arper
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Welles Whitmore, O. G. Heaton, and Frank W. Sawyer, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant for his costs. The appeal is upon the judgment-roll without a statement or bill of exceptions.
The appellant’s point on the appeal is, that the findings are not within any issue of the case.
After alleging the assignment of the claim in suit by Prank W. Sawyer to the plaintiff, and that said Frank W. Sawyer was a duly admitted and licensed attorney at law in this state, the complaint avers that at the city of Oakland, county of Alameda, state of California, the said Frank W. Sawyer, as such attorney at law, at the special instance and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Alhambra Addition Water Co. v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Schultz v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Burris v. People's Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Loftus v. FischerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Meredith v. Santa Clara Mining Ass'n of BaltimoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by15 opinions
- Haight v. HaightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Buehler v. BassettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Interstate Group Administrators, Inc. v. Cravens, Dargan & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Hanna v. McCroryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1914
- Wallace v. CrawfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.