Legal Opinion

United States v. Wigmore

District Court, S.D. California

Decided January 5, 1943No. 2499-BHPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRISON, Judge.

In this action the government seeks to recover income taxes for the years 1933 and 1940, from the estate of Olive Wills Wigmore. The administrator with will annexed admits the liability of the estate for the year 1940 but alleges that the recovery for the year 1933 is barred by the statute of limitations. The government contends that while the income tax was not assessed until 1936, the taxpayer, Olive Wills Wigmore, had executed a waiver the pertinent part of which is as follows:

“Consent Fixing Period of Limitations Upon Assessment of Income and Profit Tax.
“Cleveland, Ohio,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miller v. Standard Nut Margarine Co. of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Florsheim Brothers Drygoods Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Stange v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Shriner v. CraftSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. SzerlipDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1959
  2. Walter E. Von Kalinowski v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
  3. Bilski v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API