Legal Opinion

Wetmore v. City of San Francisco

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1872No. 2,945PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Twelfth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The defendant recovered judgment in the Court below, and the plaintiff appealed. The other facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Crockett, J.:

This action was commenced in the year 1855, and the complaint contains three counts, all in the ordinary common law form; the first upon a quantum meruit for work done and materials furnished by the plaintiff in and about the grading, planking, and bridging of Powell street in said city. Second—The ordinary count for work and labor done and materials furnished, for which, it is alleged, the defendant promised to pay the sum of one hundred and twenty-five thousand dollars. Third—Upon an account stated. The answer contains: First—A general denial. Second—An allegation…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davanay v. EggenhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Brown v. OrrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Lucas, Turner & Co. v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Toby v. Oregon Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. East Texas Fire Ins.v. CoffeeTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Birkhofer v. KrummCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Stevens v. BrownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Marysville Development Co. v. HargisIdaho Supreme Court · 1925

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API