Legal Opinion
Miller v. Standard Nut Margarine Co. of Fla.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 15, 1932No. Nos. 251 and 252PublishedCited by 419 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler
No. 251.
Respondent, a manufacturer of “ Southern Nut Product,” brought this suit in the Southern District of Florida to restrain petitioner from collecting from respondent, or from dealers selling its product, any tax purporting to be levied under the Oleomargarine Act of August 2, 1886, 24 Stat. 209, as amended by the Act. of May 9, 1902, 32 Stat. 194. Petitioner answered, denying the. essential allegations of the complaint. "Respondent applied for a temporary injunction, the court found that it would suffer irreparable injury unless petitioner were restrained pending the final disposition…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Brushaber v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Taylor v. SecorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- McCray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- United States v. MerriamSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by419 opinions
- Enochs v. Williams Packing & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bob Jones University v. SimonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Greenberg's Express, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
- United States v. Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Allen v. Regents of the University SystemSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
414 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.