Legal Opinion

Peterson v. H & R Block Tax Services, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 10, 1997No. 96 C 6647PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CASTILLO, District Judge.

Plaintiff Belinda Peterson and the putative tax class 1 (“Peterson”) allege that defendants H & R Block Tax Services, Inc. and ten of its corporate officers (collectively, “Block”) solicited and charged customers for Block’s “Rapid Refund” tax services despite knowing that these services were unavailable. Peterson claims that this scheme was intended to defraud Block’s customers, and has made it the subject of a six-count complaint. Count I alleges that Block breached the terms of a contract to provide Peterson with accurate tax advice and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Thomas FLAHERTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GAS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  4. Congregation of the Passion v. Touche Ross & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994
  5. David Rice v. Kanu Panchal, M.D., Rodrigo Sotillo, M.D., Rodrigo Sotillo, P.C., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Basile v. H & R BLOCK, INC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Cumis Insurance Society, Inc. v. PetersDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
  3. MJ & Partners Restaurant Ltd. Partnership v. ZadikoffDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
  4. Petri v. GatlinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
  5. Basile v. H & R BLOCK, INC.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API