Legal Opinion
Thomas FLAHERTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GAS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 28, 1994No. 93-3651PublishedCited by 243 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge.
Thomas Flaherty maintains that the Gas Research Institute (“GRI”) violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634, when it terminated his employment. Flaherty contends that his age was a determining factor in GRI’s decision and that GRI was retaliating against him for suggesting to another employee that the company may be discriminating on the basis of age. The district court granted GRI’s motion for summary judgment, finding that Flaherty had not suffered an “adverse employment action” under the ADEA because prior to his…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Sandra L. Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Ernest L. Crady v. Liberty National Bank and Trust Company of Indiana, Steve Richards, Branch Administrator, and Jack Ragland, Chief Executive OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Kenneth SARSHA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by243 opinions
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Linda M. Kocsis v. Multi-Care Management, Inc., D/B/A Bath Manor Special Care CentreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Brown, Regina C. v. Brody, Kenneth D.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Forbes v. EdgarCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Yanowitz v. L'OREAL USA, INC.California Supreme Court · 2005
238 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.