Legal Opinion

Basile v. H & R BLOCK, INC.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 22, 2000PublishedCited by 147 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CASTILLE, Justice.

This Court granted allocatur to address questions concerning the scope and contours of agency relationships under Pennsylvania law. Specifically, we must determine whether appellees produced sufficient evidence of an agency relationship between appellants H & R Block, Inc., H & R Block Eastern Tax Services, Inc. (collectively “Block”) and appellants’ Rapid Refund customers so that appellees’ class action complaint that Block breached a fiduciary duty to those customers may survive summary judgment.

H & R Block, Inc., provides tax preparation services…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Green v. H & R BLOCK, INC.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Cochran v. GAF Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. SMALICH v. WestfallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. P.J.S. v. Pennsylvania State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by147 opinions

  1. Etoll, Inc. v. Elias/Savion Advertising, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Barry Belmont v. MB Investment Partners, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  3. Atcovitz v. Gulph Mills Tennis Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Gutteridge v. A.P. Green Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Rauch v. Mike-MayerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API