Petri v. Gatlin
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GRADY, District Judge.
Before the court are Santanna Natural Gas Corporation’s and the individual defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint. For the reasons stated in this opinion, the motions to dismiss are granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
Viewed in the plaintiffs’ favor, the relevant facts are as follows. Under a policy known as the Transportation Gas Program, local gas distribution companies (“LDCs”) such as Peoples’ Gas Light & Coke Company, Illinois Power, and Northern Illinois Gas permit “commercial rate” customers — multi-unit apartment buddings,…
2Cases cited189 opinions
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Doe v. Boys Clubs of Greater Dallas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,228 Rocco Dileo and Louise Dileo v. Ernst & YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
184 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Avery v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
- Greenberger v. GEICO General InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Edgewater Medical Center v. Edgewater Property Co. (In Re Edgewater Medical Center)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- Kelly v. Palmer, Reifler, & Associates, P.A.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2010
- Freedom Mortgage Corp. v. Burnham Mortgage, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.