American Nat. Bank v. Dunn
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
TEEHEE, C.
The American National Bank of Ardmore brought suit against Wm. M. Dunn and 22 others to recover on certain promissory notes, in which Dunn was treated as the principal promissor, and for the foreclosure of a real estate mortgn" given by him in security thereof. The litigation here is between the parties named, who will hereinafter be referred to as plaintiff and defendant, respectively, the other defendants being referred to by name where clarity of the cause so requires.
Plaintiff’s petition was in the usual form in such cases and declared on six notes aggregating, less credits,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Massachusetts Bonding Ins. Co. v. VanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Edwards v. City Nat. Bank of McAlesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- MacKin v. Darrow Music Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- First Nat. Bank v. BoxleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Scott v. Signal Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Smith v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Morningside Hospital & Training School for Nurses v. PenningtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Mid-West Chevrolet Corp. v. NoahSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Stone v. SullivanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Palestine Drug Co. v. BoggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.