Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank v. Boxley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 12, 1927No. 17473PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MASON, V. C. J.

The First National Bank of Tulsa, as plaintiff, brought suit against J. D. Boxley, as defendant, to recover the sum of $20,000, with interest and attorney’s fee, upon a promissory note made, executed, and delivered by said defendant to the plaintiff. The defendant filed answer and supplemental answer, in which he admitted the execution of th'e note, but pleaded facts upon which he relied to relieve him from liability. Trial of the issues thus raised resulted in a verdict for the defendant, upon which judgment was entered, and to review which the bank has appealed.

It is first…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pauly v. O'BrienU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1895
  2. Elling v. Bank of JeffersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Doxy v. Exchange Bank of PerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  4. Thom v. KibbeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Deitrick v. GreaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Camerer v. California Savings & Commercial BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Cosmopolitan Financial Corp. v. RunnelsHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. CARO. WINDS OWNERS'ASSOC., INC. v. Joe Harden Bldrs., Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  5. Security Nat. Bank v. BohnefeldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API