Legal Opinion

Stone v. Sullivan

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 28, 1930No. 19311PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLETON, C.

T. A. Sullivan, an attorney of Wichita, Kan., was employed by Mrs. Myrtle Follis, a widow of that city, to recover damages from J. H. Stone, a man of considerable means, of Tonkawa, Okla., for breach of promise. Stone employed Mr. Stearns, another attorney of Wichita, to endeavor to adjust this claim and avoid the filing of the suit. Stearns called on Sullivan to discuss the situation, was given a copy of the petition it wa.s his purpose to file against Stone, and was shown the written contract between Sullivan and Eollis, whereby Sullivan was to receive one-half of the recovery…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bogart v. George K. Porter Co.California Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Jones v. SnyderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Rauer v. HertweckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. First State Bank of Keota v. BridgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Pyeatt v. EstusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lewis v. CouchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  2. Jones v. Farmers Ins. ExchangeDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1953
  3. McArthur v. LotridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. National Aid Life Insurance Co. v. NashSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. Brown v. Blackstone Consulting IncDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API