MacKin v. Darrow Music Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Tulsa County; J. W. Woodford, Judge. 'Action by the Darrow Music Company against James Mackin. Judgment for plaintiff, motion for new trial overruled, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
PRYOR, C.
This is an action commenced in the justice court of Tulsa county by ..the Darrow Music Company, defendant in error, against James Mackin, plaintiff in error, for the recovery of the possession of a certain piano or the value thereof. Tlie parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
From a judgment in favor of the defendant, plaintiff appealed to the county court of Tulsa county, where the case was tried de novo to a jury, and the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, the Dai-row Music Company, against James Mackin, defendant, for the sum of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McCann v. McCannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Weeks v. MedlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
- St. Louis. S. F. R. Co. v. TaliaferroSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Roof v. FranksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Johnston v. McCartWashington Supreme Court · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Lillard v. MeisbergerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Lacy Manufacturing Co. v. Gold Crown Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Edwards v. City Nat. Bank of McAlesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Stebbins v. Lena Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Warren v. PulleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.