Cooper v. Friesen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
This personal-injury action arises out of a motor vehicle collision at an intersection controlled by a yield-right-of-way sign. At the close of plaintiff’s case in chief, the court directed a verdict in favor of defendants. Plaintiff appeals from the denial of his post-trial motion for a new trial. The single and very close issue is whether the trial court erred in directing a verdict pursuant to Rule 50.01, Rules of Civil Procedure, on the ground the evidence was insufficient to sustain a verdict for plaintiff. We believe that the evidence would have sustained an award of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kolatz v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. KeatingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Riley v. LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Anderson v. Mid-Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Fisher v. EdbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hill v. Okay Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Maday v. Yellow Taxi Co. of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Lamke v. LoudenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Eklund v. LundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Danielson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.