Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Friesen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 4, 1973No. 43508PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rogosheske, Justice.

This personal-injury action arises out of a motor vehicle collision at an intersection controlled by a yield-right-of-way sign. At the close of plaintiff’s case in chief, the court directed a verdict in favor of defendants. Plaintiff appeals from the denial of his post-trial motion for a new trial. The single and very close issue is whether the trial court erred in directing a verdict pursuant to Rule 50.01, Rules of Civil Procedure, on the ground the evidence was insufficient to sustain a verdict for plaintiff. We believe that the evidence would have sustained an award of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kolatz v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. KeatingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  3. Riley v. LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  4. Anderson v. Mid-Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  5. Fisher v. EdbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hill v. Okay Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Maday v. Yellow Taxi Co. of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. Lamke v. LoudenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. Eklund v. LundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. Danielson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API