Legal Opinion

Maday v. Yellow Taxi Co. of Minneapolis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 6, 1981No. 81-238PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OTIS, Justice.

Plaintiffs Donna R. and Gene Maday appeal from an order of the district court limiting their recovery against Yellow Taxi Company of Minneapolis (Taxi) to 30% of the stipulated damages in this action for personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident. Taxi filed a notice of review for that portion of the order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial. The primary issue on appeal is whether Taxi is jointly and severally liable for the total damages despite the jury’s finding that it' was only 30% at fault. We conclude that Taxi is liable…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jack Frost, Inc. v. Engineered Building Components Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Mathews v. MillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  3. Ruberg v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Christy v. Menasha CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  5. Cooper v. FriesenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Coney v. J. L. G. Industries, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Layman v. Braunschweigische Maschinenbauanstalt, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Alice Ann Staab v. Diocese of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. GallowaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Erickson v. Hinckley Municipal Liquor StoreCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API