Legal Opinion

Lamke v. Louden

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 21, 1978No. 48101PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TODD, Justice.

This case arises out of an intersection collision between an automobile driven by Gerald W. Louden and one driven by Francis Lamke. Marie Lamke, age 53 at the time of the accident, was a passenger in the car driven by her husband and suffered severe injuries. Mrs. Lamke began this action against Louden and the Gelco Corporation as codefendants. Gelco was Francis Lamke’s employer and the owner of the car he was driving at the time of the collision. A jury awarded plaintiff $450,000 and attributed 93 percent of the negligence to the Gelco vehicle. We affirm.

The collision occurred…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Hallada v. Great Northern RailwaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. Riley v. LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  4. Seivert v. BassSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  5. Young Ex Rel. Young v. HansenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Germann v. F.L. Smithe MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Balder v. HaleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Flom v. FlomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Jesco, Inc. v. ShannonMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Ouellette Ex Rel. Ouellette v. SubakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API