Legal Opinion
Eklund v. Lund
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 11, 1974No. 44308, 44309PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam.
Defendants James Lund and Johann Herzig appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial and from the judgment entered against them in consolidated actions brought by plaintiffs Deborah Lynn Maxwell and Karon Louise Eklund for personal injuries sustained in an inter sectional automobile collision.
1. The ground for reversal most vigorously pressed by defendants is that the conduct of plaintiffs’ counsel was so improper that the trial court abused its discretion in denying their in-trial motions for a mistrial and post-trial motions for a new trial. The misconduct of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kolatz v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Adelmann v. Elk River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Norton v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Colgan v. RaymondSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Harris v. Breezy Point Lodge, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Blatz v. Allina Health SystemCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Kuehl v. National Tea Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Bradley v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Fore v. Health Dimensions, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Heine v. SimonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.