Legal Opinion

Riley v. Lake

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 1, 1972No. 43004PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*45Knutson, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion for amended answers to the interrogatories to the jury or for judgment notwithstanding the verdict of the jury, or for a new trial and from the judgment entered pursuant to the court’s order.

The case arises out of an intersection collision between a car driven by plaintiff and one driven by defendant Henry Arthur Lake and owned by his father, defendant Elmer H. Lake. Henry Arthur Lake will be referred to as the defendant hereinafter since the father is involved only because he was the owner of the car. The…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Moore v. KujathSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Zelinger v. State Sand & Gravel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Guptill v. RoemerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Martin v. BussertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  5. Pruss v. StrubeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Sandhofer v. Abbott-Northwestern HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Peair v. Home Ass'n of Enola Legion No. 751Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Ferguson v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Anunti v. PayetteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Martineau v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API