People v. Myers
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from Eaton; Smith, J. Lindley C. Myers was convicted of violating the local-option law.
1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.
Respondent was informed against and convicted of an alleged violation of the local-option law, and appeals to this court. Respondent, at the time of the commission of the alleged offense, was clerk of a hotel, *41and we assume that he boarded and lodged therein. The offense consisted in gratuitously furnishing beer to two dining-room girls in the room of one of them, for social purposes.
The only questions raised which require consideration are:(1) Was the beer furnished in respondent’s home so that the case is ruled by People v. Peterson, 156 Mich. 235 (120 N. W. 570, 21 L. R. A. [N. S.]…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cruse v. AdenIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Feek v. Township Board of BloomingdaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- People v. WhitneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- State v. FulksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- Reynolds v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. BedellMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- People v. HancockMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- People v. CurryMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- People v. SlaterMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- People v. C. Kern Brewing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.