People v. Hancock
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before sentence from Allegan; Padgham, J. Frank Hancock was convicted of violating the local-option law.
1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.
Respondent stands convicted of a violation of the local-option law, and has removed his case to this court for review upon exceptions before sentence.
The record shows that respondent is a farmer, and had been living for upwards of a year upon a farm near Saugatuck, in the county of Allegan. On September 24, 1910, one Schultz, a neighbor, called, in company with his little girl, to get a couple of turkeys which respondent’s wife had promised them. Schultz and respondent walked over the farm and visited for a time. Returning, respondent invited Schultz into the house. They seated themselves at…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. PetersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- People v. MyersMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- People v. BedellMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- People v. SlaterMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. PlummerMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- People v. BullockMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- People v. TartMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- People v. BudzanMichigan Supreme Court · 1940