Legal Opinion

People v. Hancock

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1911No. Docket No. 125PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Exceptions before sentence from Allegan; Padgham, J. Frank Hancock was convicted of violating the local-option law.

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.

Respondent stands convicted of a violation of the local-option law, and has removed his case to this court for review upon exceptions before sentence.

The record shows that respondent is a farmer, and had been living for upwards of a year upon a farm near Saugatuck, in the county of Allegan. On September 24, 1910, one Schultz, a neighbor, called, in company with his little girl, to get a couple of turkeys which respondent’s wife had promised them. Schultz and respondent walked over the farm and visited for a time. Returning, respondent invited Schultz into the house. They seated themselves at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. PetersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  2. People v. MyersMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. People v. BedellMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. People v. SlaterMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. PlummerMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. People v. BullockMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. People v. TartMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. People v. BudzanMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API