Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1882PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Dale Circuit Court. Tried before Hon. II. D. Clayton. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

— By statute approved February 26th, 1881— Pampli. Acts, 111 — it was made “ unlawful for any person or persons, (except upon the written prescription herein provided •for), to make, sell, or otherwise dispose of any spirituous or malt liquors, or other intoxicating drinks, within the counties of Dale and Henry, State of Alabama.” No point arises in this case on the question of a written prescription. The defendant was indicted and convicted under this statute. The testimony was, that' the defendant, at his private residence in Dale county, gave to one W. II. S. two or more drinks of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Favers v. GlassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
  2. Mayor of Wetumpka v. WinterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
  3. Thurman v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1850

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Martin v. WattsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. J. M. Carey & Brother v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  4. Austin v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. People v. MyersMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API