Legal Opinion
People v. Whitney
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 4, 1895PublishedCited by 27 opinions
Exceptions before judgment from Allegan. (Padgham, J.) Respondents were convicted of violating, the local option law. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
Respondents were convicted upon an information charging that they—
“Heretofore, to wit, on the 27th day of July, in the year one thousand eight hundred and ninety-four, at the village of Plainwell, in Allegan county, did then and there unlawfully keep a saloon and place where vinous, malt, brewed, fermented, spirituous, and intoxicating liquors, and mixed liquors and beverages, a part of which was intoxicating, were sold, stored for sale, and furnished as a beverage; they, the said Charles E. Whitney and Ellis Aldrich, not selling, storing for sale, or furnishing such liquors as a druggist or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Annis v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
- Feek v. Township Board of BloomingdaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- People v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- People v. MillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- People v. ColesMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. LorentzenMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. SinclairMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. HoustonUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- People v. ElliottIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.