Legal Opinion

People v. Slater

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1910No. Docket No. 152PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Exceptions before sentence from Clinton; Searl, J. Frank Slater was convicted of violating the local-option law.

1Opinion of the Court

Moore,. J.

The respondent is charged with a violation of the local-option law. At the close of the testimony offered by the people, his counsel asked the court to direct a verdict of acquittal. The judge said he would overrule the motion for the present, but would hear counsel at the close of all' the testimony. Testimony was then introduced on the part of the respondent. At the close of all the testimony, in response to an inquiry by the judge, counsel on both sides said they regarded it as the duty of the judge to direct a verdict. The judge instructed the jury, in substance, that it was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. NeumannMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. People v. GiddingsMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. People v. PetersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  4. People v. MyersMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. People v. BedellMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. HancockMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. People v. DenewethMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. People v. DenewethMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API