Legal Opinion

People v. Bedell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1910No. Docket No. 143PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Exceptions before judgment from Kalkaska; Lamb, J. Frank Bedell was convicted of violating the local-option law.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The information filed in this case charges that the respondent, Frank Bedell, on the 14th day of September, 1909, at the town of Boardman, in the county of Kalkaska, did give and furnish to one Judd Richardson a certain quantity of spirituous and intoxicating liquors, to wit, beer; said beer being then and there so given and furnished contrary to the local-option law in *231force in the county of Kalkaska. The respondent was convicted after a trial before a jury, and' brings the cáse to this court on exceptions before sentence. It is admitted that he was not a druggist nor a registered…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. GiddingsMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. People v. PetersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. People v. MyersMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Layzell v. J. H. Somers Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. HancockMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. People v. SlaterMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. People v. BudzanMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API