Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Richland County

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1985No. 85-078PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Weber

In Richland County District Court, the plaintiffs brought an action to quiet title to a 6¼ % royalty interest claimed in the production of oil and gas from a one-half section of Richland County land. Following submission on extensive stipulated facts, the District Court quieted title in Richland County and the plaintiffs appeal. We affirm.

The issues which we find to be determinative are:

1. Was the tax deed void because of defects in the sale proceedings prior to issuance of the certificates of tax sale, or because of a lack of notice to the property owner in the course of the tax deed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rist v. Toole CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1945
  2. O'Hanlon v. Ruby Gulch Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Barrett v. ZENISEKMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Estate of Wallace v. McAlearMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Mitchell v. Garfield CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cole v. State Ex Rel. BrownMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Filler v. Richland CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. CLAYTON BY MURPHY v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Hunter v. Rosebud CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Stanford v. Rosebud CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API