Legal Opinion

Cole v. State Ex Rel. Brown

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 2002No. 01-882PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

¶1 Plaintiffs Mack Cole, Joseph C. Heiken, B.F. “Chris” Christiaens, and Robert Emmons, filed an original proceeding in this Court challenging the validity of Constitutional Initiative 64 (CI-64) imposing term limits on ten state and federal offices. We hold that Plaintiffs’ claim is barred by laches.

¶2 Plaintiffs presented the following issues for our review:

¶3 1. Whether the failure of CI-64 to comply with all constitutionally mandated procedures is subject to strict scrutiny by this Court.

¶4 2. Whether CI-64, which required the electorate to vote on whether to impose term limits on ten…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. U. S. Term Limits, Inc. v. ThorntonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Gerberding v. MunroWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Montana Power Co. v. Montana Public Service CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Stilp v. HaferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Duggan v. BeermannNebraska Supreme Court · 1996

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Montanans for Justice: Vote No on CI-98 Not in Montana: Citizens Against CI-97 & Property Owners Against I-154 v. State Ex Rel. McGrathMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Cathcart v. MeyerWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Rentschler v. NixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  4. Anderson v. StokesMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Sernovitz v. DershawSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API