Barrett v. ZENISEK
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE HARRISON:
This action was initiated by Emma Rosypal Barrett to have defendants, Frank Zenisek, Carrie A. Petersen, and Barbie Zenisek, declared constructive trustees of certain land situated in Fergus County, and that the defendants be required to account to plaintiff for the income from said lands, less any amounts paid for taxes thereon.
More than forty-five years ago, in the homestead days of Fergus County, Montana, Vencel Zenisek with his wife, Barbara, resided on a farm near the town of Coffee Creek. Their *231children resided with them, with the exception of their married…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bordeaux v. BordeauxMontana Supreme Court · 1905
- Finlen v. HeinzeMontana Supreme Court · 1905
- Lewis v. BowmanMontana Supreme Court · 1942
- Riley v. BlackerMontana Supreme Court · 1915
- Pope v. AlexanderMontana Supreme Court · 1907
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Shimsky v. Valley Credit UnionMontana Supreme Court · 1984
- Rase v. Castle Mountain Ranch, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1981
- Eckart v. HubbardMontana Supreme Court · 1979
- Montana Power Co. v. Park Electric Co-OperativeMontana Supreme Court · 1962
- Peterson v. HopkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.