Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Rosebud County

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1989No. 89-129PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McDONOUGH

This is an appeal from an action instituted to quiet title to the minerals, mineral interest, and mineral estate previously severed from a parcel of real property located in Rosebud County Montana. Plaintiffs (hereinafter Hunters) appeal from an order granting summary judgment in favor of defendants, Boyd Kincheloe, True Oil Company, Petro-Lewis Funds Inc., et al. (hereinafter Kincheloes). We affirm. •

The issues on appeal are:

1. Whether there was a merger of the mineral estate and the remaining estate.

2. Whether the Hunters’ claims are barred by virtue of the doctrine of laches.

The facts of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Humphreys-Mexia Co. v. GammonTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Voyta v. ClontsMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Cremer v. Cremer Rodeo Land and Livestock Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Estate of Wallace v. McAlearMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Joyner v. R. H. Dearing & SonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cole v. State Ex Rel. BrownMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Wicklund v. SundheimMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Stanford v. Rosebud CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Co. v. Lang & Sons Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2011
  5. In Re Teton Coop. Reservoir Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API