Legal Opinion

O'Hanlon v. Ruby Gulch Mining Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1922No. 4,849PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway

A sufficient history of the transaction out of which this controversy arose will be found in the statement preceding the opinion upon the former appeal. (48 Mont. 65, 135 Pac. 913.)

The remittitur was filed in the district court in November, 1913, but nothing was done thereafter until July, 1918, when plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. An answer- to that complaint was made, and thereafter the answer was amended, and plaintiffs replied. The second trial, which occurred in June, 1920, resulted in a decree in favor of defendant based upon findings supporting the defense of laches and the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Foster v. Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Graham v. Boston, Hartford & Erie RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Neary v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Riley v. BlackerMontana Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Gay v. Lavina State BankMontana Supreme Court · 1921

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Carlson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1929
  2. In Re Bragg's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Kay Hunt v. Vernon J. Pick, Andrew Hunt v. Vernon J. PickCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
  4. Barrett v. ZENISEKMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Verwolf v. Low Line Irrigation Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1924

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API