Stanford v. Rosebud County
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McDONOUGH
This is an appeal from the judgment of the Sixteenth Judicial District, Rosebud County. The parties to the appeal are: the Stanfords (appellants), Earl M. Cranston and Richard C. Hoefle (appellants), and Boyd and Mavis Kincheloe (respondents). The District Court granted summary judgment whereby an oil, gas and other minerals royalty, whose title remains in dispute, was awarded: 88.889% to the Kincheloes, 5.555% to Hoefle and 5.556% to Cranston as owners of the subject property’s mineral interest in that proportion. For reasons that follow, the judgment of the District Court is reversed.
Several…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Steer, Inc. v. Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1990
- Le Vasseur v. RoullmanMontana Supreme Court · 1933
- Stokes v. TutvetMontana Supreme Court · 1958
- Young v. County of VenturaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Filler v. Richland CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Moran v. RobbinMontana Supreme Court · 1993
- Stanford v. Rosebud CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1992
- Montana Earth Resources Ltd. Partnership v. North Blaine Estates, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re MillerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 1994
- Isern v. SummerfieldMontana Supreme Court · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.