Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Romley v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 23, 2002No. 1 CA-SA02-0125, 1 CA-SA02-0126PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PATTERSON, Judge.

¶ 1 The state asks this court for special action relief to reverse the trial courts’ orders ruling that prior felony convictions for first and second time offenders sentenced under Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 13-901.01 (2001) 1 are non-felonies for impeachment purposes under Arizona Rule of Evidence 609. We deny relief.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 This is a consolidation of two eases that raise the same issue. The state charged Steven P. Steadman with theft of a means of transportation, a class 3 felony, and Cruz Olivas Landeros with knowingly possessing narcotic…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Calik v. KongableArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. MalloyArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. TuckerArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. TuzonArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State Ex Rel. Romley v. HuttCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. State v. ThuesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  3. State v. BayardiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  4. State Ex Rel. Romley v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  5. O'BRIEN v. EscherCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API