State Ex Rel. Romley v. Martin
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PATTERSON, Judge.
¶ 1 The state asks this court for special action relief to reverse the trial courts’ orders ruling that prior felony convictions for first and second time offenders sentenced under Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 13-901.01 (2001) 1 are non-felonies for impeachment purposes under Arizona Rule of Evidence 609. We deny relief.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 This is a consolidation of two eases that raise the same issue. The state charged Steven P. Steadman with theft of a means of transportation, a class 3 felony, and Cruz Olivas Landeros with knowingly possessing narcotic…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Calik v. KongableArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. MalloyArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. TuckerArizona Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. TuzonArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- State Ex Rel. Romley v. HuttCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- State v. ThuesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- State v. BayardiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- State Ex Rel. Romley v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- O'BRIEN v. EscherCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.